What should I take into consideration when assessing your performance & contributions to the SM wiki? Please help fill out the grading rubric:
Criterion |
Exceeds Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Below Expectations |
peer assessment: fair share of contribution |
25 | ||
peer assessment: timely contributions |
10 | ||
peer assessment: quality contributions |
25 | ||
overall, wiki represents a comprehensive/diverse picture of social media tools | 50 | ||
overall, wiki represents a scaleable framework for social media research | 50 | ||
usability: clear navigation, clear categories, etc. | 40 | ||
*If you get a failing grade on the peer assessment part, you will get 0 points for the entire assignment 60 points for peer assessment |
|||
TOTAL: | 200 |