SM wiki grading rubric


What should I take into consideration when assessing your performance & contributions to the SM wiki? Please help fill out the grading rubric:

 

Criterion
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Below Expectations
peer assessment:
fair share of contribution
25    

peer assessment:

timely contributions

10    

peer assessment:

quality contributions 

25    
overall, wiki represents a comprehensive/diverse picture of social media tools  50    
overall, wiki represents a scaleable framework for social media research  50    
usability: clear navigation, clear categories, etc. 40    

*If you get a failing grade on the peer assessment part, you will get 0 points for the entire assignment

60 points for peer assessment

     
       
       
TOTAL: 200